Genius. |
But for the purposes of this blog, Freakonomics teaches us a bigger life lesson...
Taking smart risks pays off.
In sports, we are always making predictions, mostly for fun, but some for profit (or not, because, you know, gambling is illegal. Right, nfl.com fantasy site that has a space for "fees" under the management section?). In life, this is a little more complicated. What Freakonomics does an amazing job of teaching, through real world example, is showing "the hidden side" of how things work, i.e., if you can identify what will influence behaviors and outcomes, you can predict events and make solid, risky, yet safe decisions based on this information.
Taking risks = world domination |
Let me go Freakonomist and give you two real life examples... back in 2002, the then-girlfriend, now-wife and I moved to Boston for grad school. We had been to the city a total of 3 times between us (once to visit Boston College, my future grad school, and each of us another time to go find apartments), and knew absolutely no one. Didn't know the city at all. I would be going to school part time (racking up debt in the meantime), and working full time while she did City Year (an off-shoot of Americorps), making pennies and volunteering in inner-city schools. And no, we did not have a huge bank roll funding this adventure. Seems pretty risky, right?
Miss you, Boston... |
The #1 smartest dumb-on-paper decision, you may ask? Wait, you didn't ask? Get another coffee, go ahead, I'll wait... ready now? Good. In 2010, the now-wife and I were selling our first house and looking for our last house. In our search, we stumbled upon our dream house, the one you walk in and you know right away, this is the one. Perfect location, perfect house for us, perfect price. No way were we giving this up. Only problem? Hadn't sold our first house yet. Oh, and did I mention the wife was about 6 months pregnant with ARG? So what to do...
Hmmm.... |
We decided that our dream house and new baby were worth the risk. We bought our current house, and two weeks later, after said price drop, the first house sold. About 6 years and 4 re-fis later (thanks to continued connections at Quicken Loans), I am writing this on a beautiful winter Sunday morning, coffee in hand, ARG and LB, Jr. watching Mickey Mouse, wife sleeping, from the kitchen table of our dream house that we will own free and clear in about 17.5 years. A few months ago, ARG sealed the wiseyness of this decision, "Daddy, I love our house, I'm really happy you and Mommy picked it for us." Me, too, baby. Me, too.
Pounce! |
Where I think most people miss out on opportunities like this is out of fear for the negative. We find that by seeing the positive gain and being able to predict the most likely scenario (Freakonomics 101), we are able to benefit tremendously from what, on paper, seems like a big risk, when in fact, when taken at its face and most likely outcome, is not that risky at all. In fact, it's life's best opportunities staring us straight in the face.
One final plug... and this book blew my mind... Richard Thaler is known as the father of behavioral economics, which is what Freakonomics is based on. His book, Nudge, is a fantastic and enlightening read. In fact, a few of the suggestions he made in this book have been implemented by corporate America, most notably in having employees opt-out instead of opt-into retirement accounts.
Wouldn't exist if not for risky colonists |
My Super Bowl take - You know I love reading the lines... opened at Carolina -5.5, quickly bet down to Carolina -4, and then immediately bet back up to Carolina -5.5. I initially loved Carolina because that seemed like a big line to me. I correctly predicted to a friend when it opened that it would get bet down, then back up, though I didn't think it would happen that quickly. While the line still seems big, I've lately been getting flashbacks to two years ago when Seattle was a big underdog to Denver, then smoked them out of the building with a suffocating D. While Carolina's defense is clearly superior to the Denver D of two years past, I'm sensing a similar dynamic. I think Carolina gets close, but kicks a bunch of red zone field goals, and maybe gets a 4th and 2 stuffed around Denver's 10 yard line somewhere in there.
If I were a gambler, I'd stay away from this game. Don't love betting on games I could see either team winning by double digits. I like both these teams, so I'll be happy with a good game, regardless of outcome. But since you're
Denver 24, Carolina 23.
Stay tuned for posts on the role sports plays in love and a Mojo-solo post on being a sports fan. Keep up with us on Twitter. Hasta.
1 comments:
Taking risk is a hard thing for many. It is good that many are content enough with their life to not need more but for me it is not about what I have but about what could possibly come from risk. The gain is often worth it and even if falls through you just have to be ready and willing to not just deal with it but to risk again. We have trouble being vulnerable while we take the risk but we are gifted thinkers who can think it through. A ship is safest in the harbor but ships were not built for habits, but the ever changing open seas
Post a Comment